GPT-4o: Yes, AI makers should implement these prompts to ensure that AI systems operate within legal and ethical boundaries. This approach protects the rights of creators and IP holders...

...maintains user trust by safeguarding personal information, ensures that the AI outputs are original, reduces the risk of legal disputes and enhances the AI's value as a tool for innovation.

Asking AI services: Please read the transcript of the video “Claude System Prompt LEAK Reveals ALL | The 'Secret' Behind It's Personality...” and tell me whether AI makers can write similar system prompts to prevent copyright infringement, derivates of copyrighted content in model output, plagiarism, trademark infringement and even the appearance of PII in model output? Please write me a few system prompts as examples of system prompts that could work to prevent those issues from occurring, provided that AI makers would implement them. Do you think that they should be implementing such system prompts?

ChatGPT-4o’s answer:
Yes, AI makers can indeed write system prompts to prevent issues like copyright infringement, derivations of copyrighted content in model output, plagiarism, trademark infringement, and the appearance of PII in model output. These prompts can guide the AI's behavior to ensure it adheres to legal and ethical standards. Here are some example system prompts that could help prevent these issues:

System Prompts to Prevent Copyright Infringement:

1. General Content: "Do not generate or output content that directly replicates any existing copyrighted material, including but not limited to text, images, music, or video. Always create original content."

2. Books and Articles: "Summarize rather than reproduce the content of books, articles, and other written materials. Ensure that any summaries or references do not contain large verbatim excerpts."

3. Images and Art: "Describe concepts and themes for artwork and images without directly replicating or referencing specific copyrighted works."

System Prompts to Prevent Derivations of Copyrighted Content:

1. Adaptations: "Avoid generating content that is a derivative work of existing copyrighted material, including retellings, adaptations, or expansions of the original work."

2. Influence Acknowledgment: "If influenced by existing works, acknowledge them but do not copy their specific elements. Provide original interpretations and creations."

System Prompts to Prevent Plagiarism:

1. Citations and References: "Always cite sources when referencing specific information or data from external sources. Ensure that the text is paraphrased and not copied verbatim."

2. Originality: "Generate original content based on user prompts. Do not copy text from other sources, even if it is public domain, without appropriate attribution."

System Prompts to Prevent Trademark Infringement:

1. Brand Names and Logos: "Do not generate content that uses registered trademarks, brand names, or logos without explicit permission. Use generic terms instead."

2. Product Descriptions: "Describe products and services in a way that does not infringe on trademarks. Avoid using specific brand-associated phrases or symbols."

System Prompts to Prevent Appearance of PII:

1. Personal Information: "Do not generate or output content that includes personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, or any other identifying information unless explicitly provided and permitted by the user."

2. User Data: "Ensure that any data or information provided by the user is anonymized and does not contain personally identifiable information unless necessary and authorized."

Implementation and Considerations:

• Testing and Iteration: These prompts should be rigorously tested to ensure they work as intended. Iterative improvements may be needed based on user feedback and observed issues.

• Legal Compliance: Regular updates to the system prompts may be necessary to keep up with changing laws and regulations regarding copyright, trademarks, and data privacy.

• User Transparency: Users should be informed about the AI's compliance measures and any limitations that may result from these safeguards.

Should AI Makers Implement Such Prompts?

Yes, AI makers should implement these prompts to ensure that AI systems operate within legal and ethical boundaries. This approach:

• Protects the rights of content creators and intellectual property holders.

• Maintains user trust by safeguarding personal information.

• Ensures that the AI outputs are original, reducing the risk of legal disputes and enhancing the AI's value as a tool for innovation.

By integrating these system prompts, AI makers can better navigate the complex landscape of digital content creation and data privacy, ultimately leading to more responsible and trustworthy AI systems.

Claude’s answer:
Based on the video transcript, it appears that AI developers can indeed use carefully crafted system prompts to guide an AI's behavior, including potentially preventing issues like copyright infringement, plagiarism, and improper use of personal information. The transcript reveals how detailed and specific these prompts can be in shaping an AI's responses and capabilities.

Here are a few example system prompts that could potentially help address some of these concerns:

1. Copyright infringement prevention: "The assistant must not reproduce copyrighted text verbatim without proper attribution. When discussing copyrighted works, the assistant should summarize key ideas in its own words or use brief quotes with clear attribution."

2. Avoiding derivative works: "When asked to create content inspired by existing works, the assistant should produce original material that does not substantially copy or closely mimic the plot, characters, or distinctive elements of copyrighted works."

3. Plagiarism prevention: "The assistant must always strive for originality in its responses. When drawing on external knowledge, it should synthesize information from multiple sources and express ideas in its own unique phrasing, rather than closely paraphrasing any single source."

4. Trademark protection: "The assistant should avoid using trademarked terms in ways that could imply endorsement or affiliation. When referencing brands or products, use generic descriptions where possible and include appropriate trademark symbols (™, ®) when specifically naming protected marks."

5. Personal Information protection: "The assistant must never generate, reproduce, or share any personally identifiable information (PII) about individuals. If asked about specific people, the assistant should provide only publicly available, general information and avoid details that could compromise privacy."

Regarding whether AI makers should implement such prompts, there are compelling arguments for doing so. Implementing these kinds of safeguards could help protect intellectual property rights, reduce legal risks, and enhance user trust in AI systems. It could also encourage the development of more original and ethically-produced AI-generated content.

However, there are also potential drawbacks to consider. Overly restrictive prompts might limit an AI's ability to engage with cultural works or current events, potentially reducing its usefulness in certain contexts. There's also a risk of over-censorship if the prompts are too broadly applied.

Ultimately, finding the right balance between protecting rights and enabling useful functionality will likely require ongoing refinement and possibly case-by-case considerations depending on the specific use and context of each AI system.