"As a result, the output that is being perceived by AI users as "transformative" may only be hallucinations about ducklings and chickens as you are making things up, due to a shortage of information"
well done! the word "hallucination" is a semantic one, very subjective as to when it applies. bottom line, human intelligence is all based on our ability to make inferences associations and ultimately decisions based on limited information. Our very survival is dependent on it because there are never any situations where we have 100% accurate input data. Humans are ALWAYS working with a limited dataset. This is a known, accepted aspect of human interaction, as none of us would ever ask another human a question and take another human's answer as the 100% definitive truth. In essence we operate woth each other under the umbrella caveat that anything any of us say must always be taken "with a grain of salt." Once we accept that making certain leaps guesses and associations is the intelligence part of the moniker artificial intelligence living somewhere along a spectrum of truth, as opposed to staying stuck in the myth of expecting computers' answers to be binary absolutes, then we will have a much better time interacting with our new life partners in this ongoing journey of exploration we're on as we orbit rapidly over and over around the massive ball of gas we call the sun.
well done! the word "hallucination" is a semantic one, very subjective as to when it applies. bottom line, human intelligence is all based on our ability to make inferences associations and ultimately decisions based on limited information. Our very survival is dependent on it because there are never any situations where we have 100% accurate input data. Humans are ALWAYS working with a limited dataset. This is a known, accepted aspect of human interaction, as none of us would ever ask another human a question and take another human's answer as the 100% definitive truth. In essence we operate woth each other under the umbrella caveat that anything any of us say must always be taken "with a grain of salt." Once we accept that making certain leaps guesses and associations is the intelligence part of the moniker artificial intelligence living somewhere along a spectrum of truth, as opposed to staying stuck in the myth of expecting computers' answers to be binary absolutes, then we will have a much better time interacting with our new life partners in this ongoing journey of exploration we're on as we orbit rapidly over and over around the massive ball of gas we call the sun.
Thank you! Do you think - generally speaking - that humans are quicker to say 'I don't know' when compared to chatbots?