Peter Thiel's influence extends deeply into the political sphere through substantial financial backing of conservative and libertarian causes, direct support for the Trump administration, and...

...strategic funding of aligned political candidates. This report analyzes Thiel's multifaceted roles, focusing on his connections to Trump, cryptocurrency and Artificial Intelligence.

Peter Thiel: Influence and Intersections Across Technology, Politics, and Finance

by Gemini Advanced, Deep Research with 2.5 Pro. Warning, LLMs can hallucinate!!

Executive Summary

Peter Thiel stands as a uniquely influential figure in contemporary America, operating at the confluence of technology, finance, and politics. As a co-founder of PayPal and Palantir Technologies, the first outside investor in Facebook, and the driving force behind venture capital firms Founders Fund and Valar Ventures, Thiel has shaped key aspects of the digital economy.¹ His influence extends deeply into the political sphere through substantial financial backing of conservative and libertarian causes, direct support for the Trump administration, and strategic funding of aligned political candidates.¹ This report analyzes Thiel's multifaceted roles, focusing on his connections to the Trump administration, his engagement with cryptocurrency (particularly Bitcoin, while critically examining links to Dogecoin), and his significant investments in Artificial Intelligence (AI), primarily through Palantir and Founders Fund. It explores the interconnections between these domains, revealing a coherent ecosystem where Thiel's business ventures, investment strategies, and political activities mutually reinforce his distinct ideological objectives. Central to this analysis are the significant controversies and ethical concerns surrounding Thiel and his companies, especially Palantir's role in government surveillance and immigration enforcement via contracts with agencies like ICE.⁶ Thiel's expressed skepticism towards democratic norms ⁹, potential conflicts of interest, and aggressive legal tactics further complicate his legacy.¹ The report identifies substantial risks associated with the concentration of technological and political power wielded by Thiel and his network, particularly concerning data privacy, civil liberties, and the integrity of democratic processes. Finally, it provides actionable recommendations for businesses, government agencies, and regulators globally to mitigate these risks through enhanced transparency, robust oversight, ethical technology governance, and updated regulatory frameworks.

I. Introduction: Peter Thiel - Architect of Influence at the Nexus of Tech, Finance, and Politics

Peter Thiel is a pivotal, complex, and often controversial figure shaping the contours of 21st-century technology, finance, and politics.¹ His trajectory from co-founding the transformative online payment system PayPal ¹ to establishing Palantir Technologies, a data analytics giant deeply embedded within government intelligence and defense apparatuses ¹, marks him as a key architect of the modern digital landscape. His early, prescient investment in Facebook cemented his status as a Silicon Valley titan ¹, while his venture capital firm, Founders Fund, channels billions into potentially world-altering technologies, including artificial intelligence and space exploration.³

Beyond the realms of technology and finance, Thiel is a significant political force. A self-described conservative libertarian ¹, he has directed substantial funding towards right-wing figures and causes.¹ His vocal support for Donald Trump, including a speaking role at the 2016 Republican National Convention and a position on the presidential transition team, underscored his willingness to engage directly in reshaping political power structures.⁴

This report provides a thorough, critical analysis of Peter Thiel's multifaceted influence. It focuses specifically on his roles concerning the Trump administration, his engagement with cryptocurrency (with a particular examination of alleged links to Dogecoin), and his deep involvement in Artificial Intelligence through investments and Palantir. The analysis explores the significant interconnections between these domains, the associated controversies and ethical risks – particularly concerning surveillance, data privacy, anti-democratic sentiments, and potential conflicts of interest – and concludes by offering potential mitigation strategies for diverse stakeholders. The research draws upon a range of sources, including specific materials analyzing Palantir's government contracts and Thiel's activities (such as those from 404 Media and various Substack posts), alongside broader publicly available information to ensure a comprehensive and critical perspective.

Thiel embodies a modern archetype: the technology billionaire actively seeking not merely to disrupt markets but to reshape political systems and societal norms according to a distinct, often radical, ideology. His career path illustrates a calculated progression from challenging established industries, such as traditional finance via PayPal ¹, towards integrating with and influencing powerful institutions, notably government agencies through Palantir ¹ and the political process through targeted funding and activism.⁴ Understanding the interplay of these elements is crucial for grasping the nature of power in the contemporary technological age.

II. The World According to Thiel: Ideology, Ventures, and Investment Strategy

A. Philosophical Foundations: Libertarianism, Nationalism, and Views on Democracy

Peter Thiel identifies as a "conservative libertarian" ¹, an ideological stance that has seemingly evolved, incorporating elements of national conservatism, particularly in his critiques of free-trade liberalism and certain aspects of "big tech".¹ This blend informs his business strategies and political engagements. Central to his worldview is a profound skepticism towards conventional democratic processes. In a widely cited 2009 essay, he declared, "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible".⁹ He attributed this incompatibility partly to the political influence of constituencies like welfare beneficiaries and women, whom he described as "notoriously tough for libertarians," suggesting their participation rendered "capitalist democracy" an oxymoron.

This critique of democracy led Thiel to advocate for an "escape from politics in all its forms," proposing that libertarians should focus their efforts on creating new spaces for freedom through technology, specifically mentioning cyberspace, outer space, and seasteading (the creation of autonomous ocean communities).⁹ This desire to bypass traditional political structures aligns with his long-standing critique of "political correctness" and multiculturalism, which dates back to his time at Stanford University where he co-founded the conservative/libertarian newspaper The Stanford Review and later co-authored The Diversity Myth.¹

Thiel's economic philosophy also diverges from traditional free-market thought. In his book Zero to One and related writings, he argues that "Competition Is for Losers," advocating that companies should strive to build monopolies, which he claims are not only profitable but also engines for societal progress by creating entirely new categories of abundance.¹ This perspective underpins his investment focus on companies seeking radical innovation and market dominance.

His political activities reflect these views, involving substantial donations to conservative and libertarian causes, figures like Ann Coulter (who dedicated a book to him), and political action committees.¹ His status as an openly gay man supporting conservative politicians and causes often seen as hostile to LGBTQ rights adds another layer of complexity to his public persona.¹

Taken together, Thiel's ideology presents a complex, sometimes seemingly contradictory, picture. His libertarian strain emphasizes individual freedom and skepticism of state control, yet his embrace of nationalism ²⁰ and his company Palantir's deep integration with government surveillance and defense ⁷ suggest a comfort with state power when wielded for purposes he deems appropriate. The consistent thread appears to be a profound dissatisfaction with the process of democratic governance and a preference for decisive action, whether through market-dominating technology or politically influential individuals, potentially favoring technocratic or even authoritarian models over broad political participation and consensus-building.²⁴

B. Building Blocks of an Empire: PayPal, Palantir, Founders Fund, and Valar Ventures

Thiel's influence is built upon several key ventures he co-founded:

• PayPal: Co-founded in 1998 (initially as Confinity, merging with Elon Musk's X.com), Thiel served as CEO until its acquisition by eBay in 2002 for $1.5 billion.¹ This transaction provided Thiel with significant personal capital and established the network of former colleagues often referred to as the "PayPal Mafia".³ Early visions for PayPal reportedly involved creating a new global currency, potentially circumventing traditional government-controlled monetary systems, aligning with Thiel's later expressed libertarian ideals.¹¹

• Palantir Technologies: Launched in 2003 with Thiel as Chairman, Palantir was conceived to apply data analysis techniques, similar to those used for fraud detection at PayPal, to national security challenges.¹ Crucially, its early development was supported by funding from In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital arm, establishing a deep connection with the intelligence community from the outset.⁷ The company focuses on big data integration and analysis for government clients (intelligence, defense, law enforcement including ICE) and has expanded into the enterprise sector.¹ The name itself, derived from the "seeing stones" in J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings, evokes power and surveillance, a controversial choice reflecting the dual nature of its technology.¹

• Founders Fund: Established in 2005 with PayPal partners Ken Howery and Luke Nosek (Sean Parker joined later), Founders Fund is a prominent Silicon Valley venture capital firm where Thiel serves as a partner.¹ It distinguishes itself with a focus on investing in companies pursuing ambitious, often "hard tech," goals, reflecting Thiel's "Zero to One" philosophy.³ Its portfolio includes early investments in Facebook and major stakes in SpaceX, Palantir, Airbnb, Stripe, and numerous AI companies.³ The fund's assets under management have grown dramatically from an initial $50 million to over $12 billion by 2023.¹⁴ While generalist, its approach is often described as contrarian, backing revolutionary ideas.¹⁴

• Valar Ventures: Co-founded in 2010 and spun out of Thiel Capital, Valar Ventures focuses on investing in technology startups located outside traditional hubs like Silicon Valley, including international markets.¹ Named after powerful angelic beings in Tolkien's mythology, the firm reflects Thiel's affinity for the author's works.¹ Valar was an early investor in companies like Xero and N26 and has also invested in cryptocurrency-related businesses such as Bitpanda and BlockFi.²

These core ventures illustrate a strategic pattern: building platforms designed to aggregate and wield power – whether financial (PayPal), informational and analytical (Palantir), or through capital allocation to transformative technologies (Founders Fund, Valar). They often operate by challenging existing systems or integrating deeply within them, mirroring Thiel's broader ideological aims of finding alternatives to, or fundamentally reshaping, established political and economic structures.⁹ Palantir, in particular, represents a direct engagement with state power, providing tools for surveillance and control ¹⁹, while Founders Fund explicitly seeks out companies with potentially monopolistic, world-changing ambitions.³

C. Investment Footprint: Beyond Core Ventures (Facebook, AI, Crypto)

Beyond his co-founded companies, Thiel's investment activities have significantly shaped the technology landscape:

• Facebook: Thiel's $500,000 investment in 2004 made him Facebook's first outside institutional investor, securing a 10.2% stake and a board seat.¹ He remained on the board until 2022 and realized over $1 billion from selling the majority of his shares.¹ This early bet dramatically increased his wealth and influence.

• Other Startups: Through Founders Fund and personal investments, Thiel has backed a wide array of successful startups, including LinkedIn, Yelp, Airbnb, SpaceX, Stripe, Lyft, and Spotify, among many others.³ His backing often signals significant potential to other investors.

• Thiel Fellowship: Launched through the Thiel Foundation, this program offers $100,000 grants to young people under 23 to drop out of college and pursue entrepreneurial projects.¹ This initiative reflects Thiel's skepticism towards traditional higher education and his belief in fostering radical innovation outside established institutions.²⁰

• Thiel Foundation: This foundation governs grant-making bodies like Breakout Labs and the Thiel Fellowship. It actively funds research in areas aligned with Thiel's interests, including artificial intelligence, life extension, and seasteading.¹

Thiel's investment strategy, particularly evident through Founders Fund, clearly prioritizes what he terms "zero to one" companies – ventures that aim to create entirely new markets or technologies, often possessing the potential for monopolistic dominance.³ This aligns directly with his philosophical critique of competition and his emphasis on achieving transformative technological progress.³² Investments in fields like AI (OpenAI, DeepMind), space exploration (SpaceX), and biotechnology (potentially via Breakout Labs or other funding) exemplify this focus on radical, potentially system-altering innovation.¹ The Thiel Fellowship further underscores this approach by encouraging talented individuals to bypass conventional paths and pursue disruptive ideas, reflecting a consistent pattern of challenging existing structures in favor of groundbreaking, albeit potentially high-risk, ventures.¹²

III. The Political Operator: Thiel, Trump, and the Reshaping of Power

A. Alliance with the Trump Administration: Support, Role, and Ideological Synergy

Peter Thiel emerged as one of Donald Trump's most prominent and earliest supporters within Silicon Valley, a sector largely critical of the candidate.¹⁶ After initially backing Carly Fiorina's bid ⁴, Thiel pivoted to Trump, providing approximately $1.5 million in financial support to his campaign and affiliated groups during the 2016 election cycle.⁵ This support, particularly a significant donation made after the release of the controversial "Access Hollywood" tape, was seen as crucial.³⁴

Thiel's backing extended beyond finances. He accepted a prime-time speaking slot at the 2016 Republican National Convention, a rare platform for an openly gay man at the event.⁴ In his speech, he praised Trump as a "builder" capable of fixing a broken America, criticized "incompetent" governance, and lamented the state of US technology compared to past achievements like the Manhattan Project and Apollo program, framing Trump as an agent of necessary disruption.¹⁶

Following Trump's victory, Thiel was appointed to the executive committee of the presidential transition team.⁵ He reportedly held significant influence, operating from an office in Trump Tower and advising on appointments, particularly within technology-related domains.¹⁷ This role immediately raised ethical concerns, given that Thiel's own companies, especially Palantir, stood to benefit substantially from policy decisions and government contracts under the new administration.⁵ Two close Thiel associates subsequently secured positions in the administration.³⁴

The alliance between Thiel and Trump appeared rooted in some ideological synergy. Both expressed nationalist sentiments, criticized globalization and perceived elite complacency, and demonstrated a willingness to disrupt established norms.⁵ Thiel viewed Trump as representing a significant "sea change" from the previous Republican establishment.¹⁷ Furthermore, Thiel's documented skepticism towards democratic norms ⁹ potentially found resonance with Trump's own challenges to democratic institutions and processes.²⁵ Thiel's support lent a veneer of Silicon Valley legitimacy to Trump's campaign, while his access to the transition team provided a direct channel to influence the incoming administration's personnel and policy direction, particularly in areas crucial to his business interests.⁵ This confluence of political support, insider access, and direct corporate interest created a potent mix, fueling concerns about the use of political influence for personal and corporate gain.⁵

B. Palantir in Government: Contracts, Controversies (ICE focus), and Influence

Palantir Technologies, co-founded and chaired by Peter Thiel ¹, has built its business largely on contracts with government agencies, particularly in the defense, intelligence, and law enforcement sectors. Its client list includes the CIA (which provided crucial early funding via In-Q-Tel), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the National Security Agency (NSA), the FBI, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), numerous branches of the US military (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Special Operations Command), and state/local agencies like the NYPD.⁷ The cumulative value of these government contracts is substantial, estimated to be in the billions of dollars over the years.⁷

Palantir's work with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) became particularly controversial during the Trump administration, aligning with the administration's aggressive immigration enforcement policies.⁷ Multiple sources, including leaked internal documents and reports from human rights organizations, detail Palantir's "mission critical" role in supporting ICE operations.⁶ Palantir provided and maintained key software systems for ICE's Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) division, notably the Investigative Case Management (ICM) system and the FALCON Search and Analysis tool.⁷

Leaked communications revealed Palantir's software was designed to help ICE locate individuals flagged for deportation, generate leads for arrests, track the logistics of mass deportation efforts, and provide agents with integrated data on targets' alleged criminality and location.⁶ Specific contracts, such as one renewed in 2019 for nearly $50 million ³⁹ and ongoing agreements contributing to a $96 million DHS contract ³⁸, funded these capabilities. Reports explicitly linked Palantir's technology to workplace raids and the identification of undocumented immigrants.⁷

This work sparked significant public backlash, including protests outside Palantir offices and CEO Alex Karp's home, and condemnation from civil liberties and immigrant rights groups like Mijente, Amnesty International, the ACLU, and the Investor Alliance for Human Rights.⁷ Critics argued Palantir was directly enabling human rights abuses, including family separations and the creation of a pervasive surveillance system targeting vulnerable populations.⁸ Palantir often countered that its technology was primarily used for investigating serious crimes like human trafficking and drug smuggling, not civil immigration enforcement.²⁸ However, government documents and reports contradicted these claims, indicating broader application in deportation operations.⁷ The company's internal awareness of these ethical issues was suggested by leaked information showing they prepared FAQs to address employee and public concerns about their ICE work.

The deep integration of Palantir's technology within ICE operations during the Trump presidency exemplifies the direct connection between Thiel's corporate interests and the administration's policy agenda. Palantir provided the technological infrastructure that enabled the scaling and efficiency of controversial immigration enforcement actions, profiting significantly in the process.⁷ The inherent secrecy surrounding government contracts and Palantir's proprietary algorithms further compounded concerns, limiting public oversight and accountability regarding the use of these powerful surveillance tools.³⁶

C. Cultivating Influence: Backing Political Candidates (Vance, Masters) and Shaping Agendas

Peter Thiel has strategically employed his wealth to cultivate political influence, often operating more like a venture capitalist placing large bets on specific individuals rather than engaging in broad-based party support. His most notable interventions came in the 2022 midterm elections, where he invested heavily in the Senate campaigns of Blake Masters in Arizona and J.D. Vance in Ohio.⁴ Thiel donated $10 million or more to Super PACs supporting each candidate, figures described as record-breaking for individual contributions to single Senate races.⁴ Both Masters and Vance had pre-existing ties to Thiel: Masters was a former employee at Thiel Capital and president of the Thiel Foundation, while Vance was a mentee who had worked at Thiel's investment firm Mithril Capital.⁴ Thiel reportedly played a key role in recruiting other major donors for Vance and facilitated Vance's introduction to Donald Trump.⁵

This targeted funding approach extends beyond these high-profile races. Thiel has contributed significantly to conservative organizations like the Club for Growth and supported other candidates aligned with his ideology, such as Kris Kobach and Carly Fiorina.¹ His support for Ron Paul's presidential campaigns, potentially through Super PACs, also aligns with his libertarian leanings.¹⁰

The selection of J.D. Vance as Trump's Vice Presidential running mate in 2024, reportedly encouraged by Thiel ⁵, represents a significant potential return on his political investments. Having a close ally in the second-highest office of the executive branch could provide unparalleled access and influence over policy decisions relevant to Thiel's diverse business interests, spanning technology, finance, AI, and government contracting.³⁴

While Thiel announced in 2023 that he did not plan to donate to political candidates in the 2024 cycle, citing disagreement with the Republican Party's focus on cultural issues ⁴, he maintained his intention to vote for Trump.⁵ This suggests a potential shift in tactics rather than a complete withdrawal from politics.

This pattern of making large, concentrated investments in specific political figures, often those with personal or professional connections, mirrors a venture capital strategy. It aims to install individuals loyal to Thiel's worldview in positions of power, potentially creating direct pathways to advance his business and ideological agendas.⁴ This method bypasses traditional lobbying and party structures, seeking influence through key personnel, a reflection perhaps of Thiel's preference for decisive action and concentrated power over distributed, consensus-driven democratic politics.⁹

IV. Crypto Contrarian: From Bitcoin Skeptic to Digital Asset Proponent

A. Thiel's Crypto Journey: Views on Bitcoin and Decentralization

Peter Thiel has become a vocal and influential proponent of cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, viewing them through the lens of his libertarian and anti-establishment ideology.² He is described as an "avid Bitcoin advocate" ² who sees digital assets as aligning with ideals of limited government, personal freedom, and privacy.² He has publicly praised Bitcoin as a store of value comparable to gold and as a hedge against the monetary policies of central banks.⁴⁵ At the Bitcoin 2022 conference, he declared Bitcoin "the most honest market in the world".

His enthusiasm wasn't immediate. In 2013 and 2014, Thiel expressed skepticism, noting Bitcoin's nascent infrastructure and low transaction volume, stating he would become more bullish as adoption grew. However, his stance evolved significantly. His support for crypto appears linked to its potential to operate outside traditional financial systems and challenge the authority of nation-states, echoing the early, arguably unrealized, ambitions of PayPal to create a new world currency.²

Thiel has also framed cryptocurrency adoption in stark geopolitical terms. While not explicitly detailed in the provided snippets, he is known for public statements suggesting Bitcoin could be viewed as a "Chinese financial weapon" against the US dollar and arguing that the US needs to embrace crypto strategically to maintain its global financial standing. This contrasts somewhat with his concerns about China potentially gaining an edge in AI, where he seems more worried about Chinese advancement.⁴⁶

Thiel's embrace of Bitcoin and the broader crypto space fits coherently within his long-articulated desire for systems that challenge or offer an escape from traditional government control.⁹ By positioning crypto not just as a financial asset but as a tool within a larger ideological and geopolitical struggle, he elevates its significance beyond mere speculation, aligning it with his project of promoting decentralized or alternative power structures that contest the existing global order.²²

B. Investing in the Digital Frontier: Founders Fund and Valar Ventures in Crypto

Peter Thiel's advocacy for cryptocurrency is backed by substantial capital deployment through his investment firms, Founders Fund and Valar Ventures. Founders Fund distinguished itself as an early institutional investor in the space, making headlines in late 2017 for accumulating Bitcoin reportedly worth $15-$20 million. This initial investment grew significantly, and the fund is reported to have generated approximately $1.8 billion in returns by liquidating its crypto holdings before the market downturn in 2022.⁴⁵ Demonstrating continued conviction, Founders Fund re-entered the market in late 2023, investing $200 million, split equally between Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), acquiring BTC when its price was below $30,000.⁴⁵

Beyond direct investments in major cryptocurrencies, Thiel's funds have backed numerous companies within the crypto ecosystem. Early investments included BitPay, a Bitcoin payment processor. Later investments through Founders Fund and Valar Ventures spanned various sub-sectors, including trading platforms (Tagomi, acquired by Coinbase; Bitpanda; Bullish), infrastructure (Layer1), and lending (Vauld; BlockFi, in which Valar held a significant 19% stake before its bankruptcy).² To bolster its expertise, Founders Fund hired Joey Krug, a known figure in the crypto space, as a partner focused on crypto investing in 2023.⁴⁵

This pattern of significant, strategically timed investments across the crypto landscape underscores that Thiel and his firms treat digital assets as a serious, long-term investment thesis, not merely a speculative sideline. The large-scale buying, selling, and subsequent re-entry into the market suggest a sophisticated approach aimed at capitalizing on volatility while maintaining exposure to the sector's potential upside.⁴⁵ These actions, managed through institutional vehicles like Founders Fund and Valar, solidify Thiel's position as a major player shaping the financial trajectory of the cryptocurrency market.

C. The Dogecoin Enigma: Assessing the Links and Significance

Claims have surfaced attempting to link Peter Thiel directly to Dogecoin (DOGE), the popular meme-based cryptocurrency heavily promoted by Elon Musk. One source ⁴⁷ asserts that Thiel expressed support for DOGE (the cryptocurrency) and connects this support to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative associated with the Trump administration and potentially Project 2025.

However, a closer examination of this claim, including an analysis of the source itself, reveals significant qualifications. The article ⁴⁷ primarily discusses Thiel's potential support for the concept of government efficiency (the DOGE initiative), suggesting it could streamline federal spending and prevent tax increases. It does not appear to provide direct evidence within its own text linking Thiel to advocating for or investing in Dogecoin cryptocurrency. Furthermore, other sources detailing Thiel's extensive views and investments in cryptocurrency focus almost exclusively on Bitcoin and Ether, emphasizing institutional strategies and libertarian ideals, with no mention of Dogecoin.² The Bitstamp profile on Thiel's crypto involvement, for instance, makes no reference to DOGE.

The confusion likely stems from the identical acronyms: DOGE (Dogecoin cryptocurrency) and DOGE (the proposed Department of Government Efficiency, reportedly co-chaired by Elon Musk under Trump ⁴⁸). Elon Musk is widely known for his enthusiastic, market-moving promotion of Dogecoin cryptocurrency.⁴⁷ Given Thiel's close ties to Musk – stemming from the PayPal era and maintained through Founders Fund investments in Musk's companies like SpaceX and Neuralink ⁵ – it is plausible that associations are being conflated.

Therefore, based on the available evidence, the connection between Peter Thiel and Dogecoin cryptocurrency appears tenuous and likely arises from a misunderstanding or conflation with the DOGE government initiative acronym. While Thiel is a major proponent of cryptocurrencies (primarily Bitcoin) and maintains a strong network connection to Musk, direct evidence supporting significant involvement with or advocacy for Dogecoin itself is lacking in the reviewed materials. His interest seems centered on cryptocurrencies with perceived fundamental value or alignment with his ideology, and potentially on the concept of governmental efficiency, rather than speculative meme coins.

V. Advancing the AI Frontier: Investment, Innovation, and Geopolitical Vision

A. Funding the Future: Thiel's Bets on Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence represents a core pillar of Peter Thiel's investment strategy and vision for technological progress. Both Thiel personally and his firm Founders Fund have made substantial commitments to advancing the field.¹ Founders Fund's portfolio prominently features leading AI companies, including foundational research labs like OpenAI (which Thiel backed financially from its inception in 2015) and DeepMind (later acquired by Google), as well as companies applying AI in specific domains like Scale AI (data labeling for AI), Anduril Industries (AI for defense), Cognition (AI for coding), Hebbia (AI for enterprise search), and Etched.ai (AI hardware).¹

Beyond venture capital, the Thiel Foundation has also channeled funds into AI research, notably supporting the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (formerly the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence), which focuses on the development of safe and beneficial AI.¹ This multi-pronged approach—spanning foundational research support, early-stage venture investment, and backing applied AI companies—demonstrates a deep, strategic commitment to the field.

Thiel's focus on AI aligns with his broader view that significant technological breakthroughs are currently concentrated in the digital realm ("bits") rather than the physical world ("atoms"), partly attributing this disparity to heavier regulation in the physical domain.¹ His investments in AI, alongside interests in life extension and cryonics ¹, suggest a belief in technology's potential to overcome fundamental human limitations and drive transformative change, consistent with his "zero to one" philosophy of seeking radical innovation.³

B. Palantir's AI Capabilities: The Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) and its Implications

Palantir Technologies, long known for its sophisticated data analytics platforms Gotham (for government/defense) and Foundry (for enterprise), has aggressively positioned itself as a leader in operationalizing Artificial Intelligence.¹⁹ The cornerstone of this strategy is its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP), launched to enable organizations to integrate Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, as well as various open-source models, directly into their core operational workflows.¹⁹

AIP is designed to function within secure and complex environments, including private networks and classified government systems.²⁷ Its stated capabilities include allowing users to build AI-powered applications, automate tasks, evaluate AI model performance, and manage deployment across diverse settings.⁵⁴ Palantir showcases AIP's utility across numerous sectors, from commercial industries like finance, insurance, healthcare, and manufacturing ⁵³ to high-stakes government and military applications.²⁷

Demonstrations of AIP have explicitly depicted military use cases, such as analyzing battlefield intelligence, identifying enemy equipment, generating potential courses of action for targeting, ordering drone reconnaissance, and coordinating electronic warfare (jamming communications).⁵⁵ This highlights Palantir's ambition to embed AI deeply within defense operations, aiming to provide "AI-driven combat superiority".⁵⁴

Palantir consistently emphasizes the ethical guardrails built into AIP, promoting features for granular access control, data provenance tracking, and maintaining a "human in the loop" for critical decisions.⁵⁵ The company argues these controls mitigate legal, regulatory, and ethical risks.⁵⁵ However, critics raise serious concerns. The role of the human operator in demos often appears minimal, primarily approving AI suggestions, potentially leading to dangerous levels of automation and abstraction in warfare.⁵⁵ Furthermore, the known fallibility of LLMs, including their tendency to "hallucinate" or generate incorrect information, poses significant risks when applied in lethal contexts.⁵⁵ The adequacy of Palantir's promised safeguards in addressing these inherent AI risks remains a critical point of contention.⁵⁸

Palantir's strategic partnership with Microsoft to deploy AIP on Azure Government cloud platforms, including for classified workloads and potentially integrating Azure OpenAI services ²⁷, further underscores its intent to become the central operating system for AI within the most sensitive sectors of government and defense. This positions Palantir at the forefront of operationalizing AI in ways that carry profound ethical implications, particularly regarding autonomous systems, surveillance, and the future of warfare.⁵⁵

C. AI Strategy: Perspectives on Risk, Potential, and Competition (esp. China)

Peter Thiel's perspective on Artificial Intelligence is heavily influenced by geopolitical considerations, particularly the perceived competition between the United States and China. While acknowledging the potential for AI to go "super super haywire" ⁴⁶, his public statements often prioritize the imperative of US dominance in the field. He has expressed concern about the technological singularity "not arriving soon enough" ¹, suggesting a desire for accelerated progress.

Thiel has actively framed AI development as a race against China. He publicly called for a government investigation into Google's AI work in China, suggesting potential infiltration by foreign intelligence.¹ He argues forcefully that the US must pursue AI development aggressively, contending that regulation within the US would be counterproductive if China proceeds without similar constraints.⁴⁶ This competitive framing serves as a rationale against stringent domestic regulation or potentially slowing down development for ethical considerations, implying that winning the race is paramount.

Interestingly, Thiel has also posited that China's ruling Communist Party (CCP), being "crazy-fanatical" about maintaining control, might paradoxically be more inclined to regulate AI or put brakes on its development if it perceives the technology as a threat to its power.⁴⁶ This introduces a nuance but doesn't detract from his primary argument that US competitiveness demands rapid advancement.

This perspective is echoed by Palantir CEO Alex Karp, who frequently emphasizes the need for Western nations, particularly the US, to lead in AI to ensure that democratic values shape its future, contrasting this with authoritarian regimes like China.⁶⁰ Palantir explicitly states it does not do business with China.⁶⁰

Thiel's focus on geopolitical competition shapes his approach to AI risk and regulation. The perceived threat from China provides a powerful justification for prioritizing rapid development and deployment, potentially downplaying domestic risks or ethical complexities. This narrative conveniently aligns with the commercial interests of the AI companies Thiel invests in and leads, which benefit from an environment favoring swift innovation and adoption, particularly within the defense sector driven by national security concerns.⁴⁶

VI. Synthesizing the Strands: How Politics, Crypto, and AI Intersect in Thiel's World

Peter Thiel's activities across politics, cryptocurrency, and artificial intelligence are not isolated endeavors but rather interconnected components of a larger strategic ecosystem designed to advance his distinct ideological and business objectives. His political maneuvering, particularly his support for the Trump administration and targeted funding of candidates like J.D. Vance, serves to create a more favorable operating environment for his ventures.⁵ This influence can translate into lucrative government contracts for Palantir, especially in defense and surveillance ⁵, and potentially foster a lighter regulatory touch for the technology sectors he invests in, including AI and crypto. The "revolving door" phenomenon, where individuals associated with Thiel move between his companies and government roles, further solidifies these connections and potential conflicts of interest.⁵

Thiel's strong advocacy for cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin, aligns seamlessly with his libertarian roots and his critique of centralized state power.² Promoting assets that operate outside the traditional financial system controlled by central banks can be seen as a practical extension of his desire to "escape from politics" and challenge established governmental structures.⁹ This ideological alignment provides a powerful narrative framework for his financial investments in the crypto space.

Simultaneously, Palantir's development of AI, particularly the AIP platform tailored for government, defense, and intelligence clients ¹⁹, resonates with Thiel's more recent embrace of national conservatism and his focus on geopolitical competition, primarily with China.²⁰ Providing cutting-edge AI tools to enhance US military and intelligence capabilities directly supports this nationalist viewpoint, framing technological advancement as crucial for national security.⁵⁵

The network effect is amplified by the close-knit "PayPal Mafia," the group of former colleagues including Thiel, Elon Musk, David Sacks, and Max Levchin, who often share ideological leanings, invest in each other's ventures (e.g., Founders Fund backing Musk's SpaceX and Neuralink ⁵), and potentially coordinate political influence.³ This insular network concentrates significant power and reinforces the intersections between their technological ventures and political goals.⁴⁸

Ultimately, these strands weave together into a coherent strategy. Thiel's anti-democratic ideology ⁹ provides a rationale for leveraging technology (AI via Palantir) and alternative financial systems (crypto) to bypass or reshape traditional political processes. His direct political action (funding, advising) aims to install allies and create favorable conditions for these ventures. In turn, the success of Palantir strengthens state surveillance and defense capabilities, aligning with his geopolitical outlook, while his crypto advocacy offers a challenge to the very systems he critiques. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle where political access aids business, business provides tools and narratives supporting political aims, and alternative systems challenge the status quo, all orchestrated to maximize Thiel's influence across multiple domains.

VII. A Legacy Under Scrutiny: Dubious Activities, Ethical Lapses, and Potential Harms

Peter Thiel's rise to prominence has been accompanied by significant controversy and criticism regarding the practices of his companies, his political activities, and his personal conduct.

A. Surveillance, Data Privacy, and Civil Liberties Concerns (Focus on Palantir/ICE)

Palantir Technologies sits at the center of major ethical debates concerning surveillance, data privacy, and civil liberties. The company's core business involves creating tools that enable governments and corporations to integrate and analyze vast quantities of data, effectively facilitating mass surveillance.¹³ Palantir software can fuse disparate datasets—including arrest records, license plate reader data, social media information, financial transactions, and more—to build detailed profiles of individuals and map relationships, often without the subject's knowledge or consent.¹³

The company's contracts with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have drawn the most intense criticism.⁷ As documented by organizations like Mijente, Amnesty International, and the Investor Alliance for Human Rights, Palantir's ICM and FALCON software played a crucial role in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, allegedly used to identify, locate, and track individuals for deportation, facilitate workplace raids, and manage mass detention logistics.⁶ This direct link between Palantir's technology and policies resulting in family separations and widespread fear within immigrant communities has led to accusations that the company is complicit in human rights violations.⁸

Beyond ICE, Palantir's deployment with domestic law enforcement, such as the LAPD's use of its software to analyze license plate reader data ⁴⁰, raises concerns about mission creep and the potential for racial bias inherent in predictive policing algorithms and surveillance targeting.⁶⁵ Compounding these issues is a persistent lack of transparency. Palantir operates under layers of corporate and governmental secrecy, making it difficult for the public, civil liberties groups (like the ACLU ⁴¹), and even oversight bodies to understand precisely how its powerful algorithms work and how government agencies are using them.³⁶

The introduction of Palantir's Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) for military applications adds another layer of ethical concern. The potential for AI-driven targeting and decision-making in warfare, even with claimed human oversight, raises fundamental questions about accountability, the risk of errors leading to civilian casualties, and the potential lowering of the threshold for using lethal force.⁵⁵

B. Challenging Democratic Norms: Influence, Ideology, and Conflicts of Interest

Thiel's actions and stated beliefs frequently appear to challenge democratic principles. His explicit statement questioning the compatibility of freedom and democracy ⁹, coupled with his advocacy for monopolies ¹, suggests a preference for systems where power is concentrated and potentially less accountable to public will.

His deep involvement in politics while simultaneously chairing a major government contractor (Palantir) creates significant potential for conflicts of interest.⁵ His access to the Trump transition team and his funding of key political figures could be perceived as efforts to shape policies and secure contracts beneficial to his companies. The movement of Thiel associates between his firms and government positions reinforces these concerns about undue influence and a "revolving door".⁵

The sheer scale of Thiel's political spending, particularly the multi-million dollar investments in candidates like Vance and Masters, raises broader questions about the impact of billionaire influence on democratic elections and representation.⁴ Critics argue such concentrated funding can drown out ordinary voices and skew political outcomes towards the interests of the ultra-wealthy.

Furthermore, Thiel's covert funding of the lawsuit that led to the bankruptcy of Gawker Media is widely seen as a vindictive use of immense wealth to destroy a media outlet that had published critical coverage, including outing Thiel as gay.¹ This action raised alarms about the potential for billionaires to weaponize the legal system to silence critics and suppress free speech.

C. Other Controversies: Legal Battles, Citizenship, Tax Practices

Palantir has faced legal challenges beyond the ethical critiques of its core business, including settling a lawsuit with i2 Inc. over alleged intellectual property theft ¹⁹ and facing a lawsuit alleging discrimination against Asian job applicants.⁷ The company was also implicated in a controversial plan drafted by HBGary Federal (and leaked by Anonymous) to use Palantir software in a campaign to discredit WikiLeaks and its supporters.¹⁹

Thiel's personal affairs have also attracted scrutiny. His acquisition of New Zealand citizenship in 2011, despite spending only 12 days in the country (far short of the usual 1,350-day residency requirement), sparked controversy over potential preferential treatment for wealthy investors.¹ Additionally, a ProPublica investigation revealed Thiel used a Roth IRA, typically intended for modest retirement savings, to amass a tax-free fortune exceeding $5 billion through strategic investments in his own startups, raising questions about the fairness of the tax system and the exploitation of loopholes by the ultra-rich.²² Palantir's own internal documents suggest an awareness of the ethical sensitivity surrounding its work, particularly with ICE, indicating preparations to manage potential fallout.

D. Summary Table of Alleged Dubious/Unethical/Potentially Unlawful Activities

The following table consolidates key activities associated with Peter Thiel and his companies that have drawn significant ethical, legal, or societal criticism:

VIII. Charting a Course for Mitigation: Recommendations for Stakeholders

The concentration of influence wielded by figures like Peter Thiel, amplified by powerful technologies developed by companies like Palantir, presents significant risks to privacy, civil liberties, democratic norms, and equitable economic development. Mitigating these risks requires a multi-faceted approach involving businesses, government agencies, and regulators globally.

A. Guidance for Businesses:

• Embed Ethical Technology Development: Companies developing powerful data analytics and AI tools must integrate robust ethical review processes from the outset. This includes conducting human rights impact assessments, particularly for technologies with dual-use potential or intended for government/enforcement applications.³⁷ Employing "red teaming" to anticipate potential misuse and establishing clear ethical guidelines that prioritize human well-being over pure technological capability or profit are essential.

• Conduct Rigorous Due Diligence: Before entering into contracts, especially with government agencies engaged in sensitive or controversial activities (e.g., surveillance, immigration enforcement), businesses must perform thorough due diligence.³⁷ This involves understanding precisely how their technology will be used, assessing the potential for human rights harms, and embedding clear contractual limitations and safeguards against misuse. Refusing contracts that pose unacceptable ethical risks should be a viable option.

• Enhance Transparency: While respecting legitimate needs for confidentiality (e.g., trade secrets, national security classifications), tech companies should strive for greater transparency regarding the capabilities of their technologies and the nature of their government contracts.⁶⁹ Clearer public communication about how powerful algorithms function and are governed can help build trust and enable informed public debate.

• Manage Political Engagement Risks: Businesses should establish clear internal policies governing political donations, lobbying activities, and employee involvement in political campaigns to avoid actual or perceived conflicts of interest.⁶⁶ Partnerships with politically influential figures require careful risk assessment regarding potential reputational damage or entanglement in partisan controversies.

B. Imperatives for Government Agencies (US & International):

• Reform Procurement Practices: Government agencies must adopt stricter vetting and procurement processes for sensitive technologies like AI and surveillance tools.⁶⁸ This should include mandatory disclosure of vendor ownership structures, foreign affiliations, potential conflicts of interest, and robust assessments of the technology's ethical implications and potential for bias or misuse.⁶⁹ Human rights impact assessments should be standard for high-risk procurements. Procurement transparency should be increased.⁷⁰

• Strengthen Contract Oversight and Auditing: Independent bodies or robust internal mechanisms are needed to oversee the deployment and use of powerful technologies by government agencies.⁶⁸ Regular, independent audits should verify compliance with laws, policies, contractual limitations, and ethical guidelines. Contracts must include clear terms regarding data usage, access controls, and penalties for violations.³⁶

• Implement Robust Data Governance: Clear rules must govern the collection, sharing, processing, and retention of data by government agencies, especially when private contractors are involved.³⁶ Principles of data minimization, purpose limitation, and robust security must be enforced. Transparency regarding government data practices involving third-party tools needs significant improvement.

• Foster Competition and Avoid Vendor Lock-in: Agencies should actively promote a competitive marketplace for government technology solutions to avoid over-reliance on single, powerful vendors like Palantir.⁷¹ Procurement processes should be designed to be fair, open, and encourage innovation from a diverse range of providers.

C. Frameworks for Regulators (US & International):

• Enact Comprehensive Data Privacy Legislation: The US urgently needs federal baseline privacy legislation that provides meaningful protections for personal data across commercial and governmental contexts, similar to the EU's GDPR. Existing privacy regulations must be vigorously enforced.⁷²

• Establish Binding AI Ethics and Safety Standards: Regulators must develop and enforce clear, legally binding standards for the development and deployment of high-risk AI systems, particularly those used in critical sectors like law enforcement, defense, healthcare, and finance.⁶⁵ These standards should mandate transparency, accountability, bias mitigation, human oversight, and robustness. Certain high-risk applications may warrant moratoria or outright bans. Supporting the development of public AI infrastructure could provide a more accountable alternative to purely private development.⁶⁷

• Apply Antitrust Scrutiny: Regulators should closely examine the market power of dominant technology firms, particularly those heavily involved in government contracting and AI, like Palantir. The potential anti-competitive effects of strategies aiming for monopoly, as advocated by Thiel ⁵, should be assessed, and antitrust tools deployed where necessary to ensure fair competition and prevent undue concentration of power.

• Increase Transparency of Political Influence: Regulations governing lobbying disclosure, campaign finance (especially addressing the opacity of Super PACs and "dark money" groups), and the "revolving door" between government service and industry need strengthening to limit the disproportionate influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on policy.⁶⁶ Mandating greater transparency from government contractors regarding their political spending could help illuminate potential conflicts.

• Promote International Cooperation: Given the global reach of major tech companies and investors like Thiel, international collaboration is crucial for developing consistent standards on AI ethics, data protection, competition policy, and the regulation of cross-border data flows and political influence.

Addressing the challenges posed by figures like Peter Thiel requires more than relying on corporate self-regulation. It necessitates a proactive and coordinated effort by governments and regulators to establish clear ethical boundaries, enforce transparency and accountability, and ensure that technological advancement serves broad public interests rather than narrow private or ideological agendas.

IX. Conclusion: Understanding Thiel's Impact and the Path Forward

Peter Thiel has undeniably carved a significant and deeply controversial path through the landscapes of modern technology, finance, and politics. His ventures, from the foundational disruption of PayPal to the state-integrated power of Palantir and the forward-looking investments of Founders Fund, demonstrate a consistent drive towards transformative, often monopolistic, technological change. This drive is underpinned by a complex ideology that blends libertarian ideals with nationalist sentiments and a profound skepticism towards traditional democratic processes.

The analysis reveals a tightly woven ecosystem where Thiel's political activities, cryptocurrency advocacy, and AI investments are not disparate threads but interconnected elements reinforcing one another. His support for the Trump administration and specific political candidates provided access and potentially favorable conditions for his business interests, particularly Palantir's lucrative government contracts. Palantir's AI capabilities, in turn, align with his geopolitical vision and provide tools for state power. His promotion of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin offers a challenge to the established financial order he critiques. This synergy allows Thiel to exert influence across multiple domains simultaneously.

However, this influence comes laden with significant risks and ethical quandaries. Palantir's role in enabling government surveillance and controversial immigration enforcement actions raises serious human rights concerns. Thiel's anti-democratic rhetoric, coupled with his immense wealth deployed to influence elections and silence critics, poses challenges to democratic norms and institutions. Potential conflicts of interest arising from his overlapping roles as investor, contractor, and political influencer further erode public trust.

The concentration of power in figures like Thiel, amplified by the transformative potential of technologies like AI, necessitates ongoing vigilance and critical scrutiny. The path forward requires proactive governance. Businesses must prioritize ethical development and due diligence. Government agencies must reform procurement and enhance oversight to become responsible consumers of technology. Regulators, both domestic and international, must establish and enforce clear rules for data privacy, AI safety, competition, and political transparency. Ultimately, ensuring that the powerful technologies shaped and promoted by figures like Peter Thiel serve the broader public good, rather than narrow interests or radical ideologies, demands a concerted effort from all sectors of society to uphold principles of accountability, transparency, and democratic control.

Works cited

1. Peter Thiel - Wikipedia, accessed April 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel

2. Who is Peter Thiel? - Bitstamp, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.bitstamp.net/learn/people-profiles/peter-thiel/

3. Peter Thiel - Founders Fund, accessed April 17, 2025, https://foundersfund.com/team/peter-thiel/

4. Peter Thiel - Ballotpedia, accessed April 17, 2025, https://ballotpedia.org/Peter_Thiel

5. Billionaires and the Trump Admin: Peter Thiel - Revolving Door Project, accessed April 17, 2025, https://therevolvingdoorproject.org/billionaires-and-the-trump-admin-peter-thiel/

6. Leaked: Palantir's Plan to Help ICE Deport People - 404 Media, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.404media.co/leaked-palantirs-plan-to-help-ice-deport-people/

7. The War Against Immigrants: Trump's Tech Tools Powered by Palantir - Mijente, accessed April 17, 2025, https://mijente.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Mijente-The-War-Against-Immigrants_-Trumps-Tech-Tools-Powered-by-Palantir_.pdf

8. Failing to Do Right: The Urgent Need for Palantir to Respect Human Rights - Amnesty International USA, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.amnestyusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Amnest-International-Palantir-Briefing-Report-092520_Final.pdf

9. The Education of a Libertarian | Cato Unbound, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/education-libertarian/

10. Peter Thiel Net Worth, Biography, Age, Spouse, Children & More - Goodreturns, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.goodreturns.in/peter-thiel-net-worth-and-biography-blnr552.html

11. Peter Thiel | Biography & Facts | Britannica Money, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/money/Peter-Thiel

12. Peter Thiel - Forbes, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/profile/peter-thiel/

13. Palantir and the Chaos Dance | The Generalist, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.generalist.com/briefing/palantir-ipo

14. Founders Fund - Wikipedia, accessed April 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founders_Fund

15. Portfolio - Founders Fund, accessed April 17, 2025, https://foundersfund.com/portfolio/

16. Peter Thiel: Silicon Valley Billionaire Will Speak at RNC | TIME, accessed April 17, 2025, https://time.com/4416781/peter-thiel-rnc-convention-speech-donald-trump/

17. Peter Thiel named to Trump transition team - Washington Blade, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.washingtonblade.com/2016/11/11/thiel-named-committee-member-trump-transition-team/

18. Peter Thiel | Immigrant Entrepreneurship, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org/entries/peter-thiel/

19. Palantir Technologies - Wikipedia, accessed April 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palantir_Technologies

20. Wait, Wasn't Peter Thiel a Libertarian? - Reason Magazine, accessed April 17, 2025, https://reason.com/2020/08/02/wait-wasnt-peter-thiel-a-libertarian/

21. How Dangerous Is Peter Thiel? - Mother Jones, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/11/how-dangerous-is-peter-thiel/

22. Peter Thiel: The Billionaire Buying the End of Democracy - More Perfect Union, accessed April 17, 2025, https://perfectunion.us/peter-thiel-the-billionaire-buying-the-end-of-democracy/

23. Follow The Money: Why PayPal's Peter Thiel Won a Key Slot at RNC 2016 - TriplePundit, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.triplepundit.com/story/2016/follow-money-why-paypals-peter-thiel-won-key-slot-rnc-2016/24121

24. Who's Afraid of Peter Thiel? A New Biography Suggests We All Should Be - Time, accessed April 17, 2025, https://time.com/6092844/peter-thiel-power-biography-the-contrarian/

25. The Anti-Democratic Worldview of Steve Bannon and Peter Thiel ..., accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/donald-trump-steve-bannon-peter-thiel-214490

26. Palantir just got booted out of a government social care contract! - Foxglove, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.foxglove.org.uk/2021/09/17/palantir-social-care/

27. Palantir to deploy AI products on Microsoft Azure for US government agencies, accessed April 17, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/tech/technology/palantir-to-deploy-ai-products-on-microsoft-azure-for-u-s-government-agencies/articleshow/112380586.cms

28. Palantir's Growth Story: How the Magic of Data Analysis Is Changing the World - Medium, accessed April 17, 2025, https://medium.com/@takafumi.endo/palantirs-growth-story-how-the-magic-of-data-analysis-is-changing-the-world-05fe98f4c2af

29. Founders Fund investor portfolio, rounds & team | Dealroom.co, accessed April 17, 2025, https://app.dealroom.co/investors/founders_fund

30. Thiel-Backed Valar Ventures Closes $150M For Fund V - Crunchbase News, accessed April 17, 2025, https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/thiel-backed-valar-ventures-closes-150m-for-fund-v/

31. Valar Ventures - Wikipedia, accessed April 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valar_Ventures

32. Peter Thiel II Transcript - Conversations with Bill Kristol, accessed April 17, 2025, https://conversationswithbillkristol.org/transcript/peter-thiel-ii-transcript/

33. Trump Disrupts the Valley - Dissent Magazine, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/trump-disrupts-silicon-valley-tech-industry-democratic-party/

34. The billionaire who fueled JD Vance's rapid rise to the Trump VP spot - CBS News, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jd-vance-trump-vp-peter-thiel-billionaire/

35. Thiel Joins Trump Transition Team: What Will His Role Be? - YouTube, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAk0ftHkKyc

36. Palantir Contract Dispute Exposes NYPD's Lack of Transparency, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/palantir-contract-dispute-exposes-nypds-lack-transparency

37. human rights risks briefing: palantir technologies, accessed April 17, 2025, https://investorsforhumanrights.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2019-11/FINAL%20Investor%20Alliance_Human%20Rights%20Risk%20Briefing%20-%20Palantir.pdf

38. Government Hires Controversial AI Company to Spy on "Known Populations" - Futurism, accessed April 17, 2025, https://futurism.com/government-ice-palantir

39. ICE Renews Controversial Palantir Software Contract - GovTech, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.govtech.com/computing/ice-renews-controversial-palantir-software-contract.html

40. The Privacy Concerns of Palantir, Police Departments & the Judicial Process, accessed April 17, 2025, https://sjipl.mainelaw.maine.edu/2021/10/15/the-privacy-concerns-of-palantir-police-departments-the-judicial-process/

41. ACLU Files FOIA Request Demanding How DHS, ICE Reveal How They Use Amazon Rekognition - The Sociable, accessed April 17, 2025, https://sociable.co/technology/aclu-foia-request-dhs-ice-amazon-rekognition/

42. Palantir's Now Public, But Our Work Is Far From Finished | #NoTechForICE, accessed April 17, 2025, https://notechforice.com/palantirs-now-public-but-our-work-is-far-from-finished/

43. All roads lead to Palantir: A review of how the data analytics company has embedded itself throughout the UK - Privacy International, accessed April 17, 2025, https://privacyinternational.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/All%20roads%20lead%20to%20Palantir%20with%20Palantir%20response%20v3.pdf

44. JD Vance's mentor co-founded company that helps Israel generate 'kill lists' of Palestinians in Gaza | Middle East Eye, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-jd-vance-peter-thiel-founded-company-helps-israel-kill-lists-palestinians-gaza

45. Peter Thiel's Founders Fund made $200 million crypto investment before bull run, accessed April 17, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/markets/cryptocurrency/peter-thiels-founders-fund-made-200-million-crypto-investment-before-bull-run/articleshow/107642900.cms

46. Thiel on AI & Racing with China - LessWrong, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xbpig7TcsEktyykNF/thiel-on-ai-and-racing-with-china

47. Silicon Statesmen: How Tech Titans Bend the State to Their Will ..., accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.diggitmagazine.com/silicon-statesmen-how-tech-titans-bend-state-their-will

48. Peter Thiel Dreams of Empire | TechPolicy.Press, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.techpolicy.press/peter-thiel-dreams-of-empire/

49. Peter Thiel's Founders Fund Closes $4.6B Growth Fund - Crunchbase News, accessed April 17, 2025, https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/thiel-founders-fund-late-stage-growth-fund/

50. Peter Thiel - portfolio and founded companies - Tracxn, accessed April 17, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/people/peter-thiel/__5GyjNuF1ts5vtAbLawGTG0NffbSJZXMqKwfs_QDvAiU

51. Peter Thiel's Investing Profile - Founders Fund Managing Partner - Signal NFX, accessed April 17, 2025, https://signal.nfx.com/investors/peter-thiel

52. Peter Thiel investor portfolio, rounds & team | Dealroom.co, accessed April 17, 2025, https://app.dealroom.co/investors/peter_thiel

53. Palantir's AI Sparks a Stock Market Frenzy in 2024 - AIM Research, accessed April 17, 2025, https://aimresearch.co/market-industry/palantirs-ai-breakthrough-is-turning-2024-into-a-stock-market-sensation

54. Palantir: Home, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.palantir.com/

55. Palantir Demos AI to Fight Wars But Says It Will Be Totally Ethical ..., accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.vice.com/en/article/palantir-demos-ai-to-fight-wars-but-says-it-will-be-totally-ethical-dont-worry-about-it/

56. Palantir Artificial Intelligence Platform, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.palantir.com/platforms/aip/

57. What does this mythical growth stock company Palantir actually do ? : r/investing - Reddit, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/comments/1ih095a/what_does_this_mythical_growth_stock_company/

58. Palantir claims applying generative AI to warfare is "ethical" without addressing problems of LLMs - Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/palantir-claims-applying-generative-ai-to-warfare-is-ethical-without-addressing-problems-of-llms/

59. The Palantir Argument Most Investors Completely Overlook, Explained By Peter Thiel, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CTj0Bhu_IM

60. How Palantir And Its Data-Mining Empire Became So Controversial - YouTube, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LQCsPbA6rU

61. Strong Man Karp of Palantir (the ones who have ... - Pascal's Substack, accessed April 17, 2025, https://p4sc4l.substack.com/p/strong-man-karp-of-palantir-the-ones

62. Peter Thiel: The Stagnation of Science and the AI Revolution - YouTube, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF2la6FxVQc

63. Tech Titans and the Surveillance State: Examining Support for Public Surveillance Among U.S. Technology Leaders - ResearchGate, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384113023_Tech_Titans_and_the_Surveillance_State_Examining_Support_for_Public_Surveillance_Among_US_Technology_Leaders

64. Palantir's Privacy Protection: A Moral Stand or Just Good Business?, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.aei.org/technology-and-innovation/palantirs-privacy-protection-moral-stand-just-good-business/

65. POLICE TECHNOLOGY EXPERIMENTS - Columbia Law Review -, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.columbialawreview.org/content/police-technology-experiments/

66. Corporate Influence Over Legislation/Regulation on Key Themes Affecting the Public Interest, Prompts Investors to File Numerous Proposals Scrutinizing Corporate Political Activity, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.iccr.org/corporate-influence-over-legislation-regulation-on-key-themes-affecting-the-public-interest-prompts-investors-to-file-numerous-proposals-scrutinizing-corporate-political-activity/

67. How public AI can strengthen democracy - Brookings Institution, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-public-ai-can-strengthen-democracy/

68. Federal Contract Risk Mitigation: Strategies for Success - Hinz Consulting, accessed April 17, 2025, https://hinzconsulting.com/federal-contract-risk-mitigation/

69. Eliminating Foreign Influence in Federal Contracting | The Chertoff Group, accessed April 17, 2025, https://chertoffgroup.com/eliminating-foreign-influence-in-federal-contracting/

70. Make Foreign Adversary Bills Smarter | ITIF, accessed April 17, 2025, https://itif.org/publications/2025/04/07/make-foreign-adversary-bills-smarter/

71. How Private Tech Companies Are Reshaping Great Power Competition - Johns Hopkins SAIS, accessed April 17, 2025, https://sais.jhu.edu/kissinger/programs-and-projects/kissinger-center-papers/how-private-tech-companies-are-reshaping-great-power-competition

72. How Harris and Trump differ on tech policy - Brookings Institution, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-harris-and-trump-differ-on-tech-policy/

73. Uncovering Conflicts of Interest and Self-Dealing in the Executive Branch | Brennan Center for Justice, accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/uncovering-conflicts-interest-and-self-dealing-executive-branch

74. accessed April 17, 2025, https://gizmodo.com/peter-thiels-spy-company-gets-into-bed-with-ice-as-trump-says-hell-deport-u-s-citizens-2000590772

75. accessed April 17, 2025, https://p4sc4l.substack.com/p/thiels-career-has-mostly-been-about

76. accessed April 17, 2025, https://p4sc4l.substack.com/p/the-blurred-boundaries-between-business