MS Copilot's analysis of "Elon Musk vs OpenAI". The complaint seeks to compel the defendants to follow the original agreement and to return to their mission of developing AI for the public good
The agreement was to develop AI for the benefit of humanity, not for profit or power, and to make it open-source, meaning that anyone could access and use it
Question 1 of 5 for MS Copilot: Please read this webpage and tell me what it says in easy to understand language
MS Copilot’s answer:
Here is a summary of the main points of the web page:
The web page is a complaint filed by Elon Musk, a famous entrepreneur and investor, against Samuel Altman, Gregory Brockman, and OpenAI, a research organization that works on artificial intelligence (AI).
The complaint alleges that the defendants breached a founding agreement that they made with Musk when they created OpenAI in 2015. The agreement was to develop AI for the benefit of humanity, not for profit or power, and to make it open-source, meaning that anyone could access and use it.
The complaint claims that the defendants violated the agreement by secretly developing a closed-source, for-profit AI system called GPT-4, which is a very powerful and advanced form of AI that can perform many tasks better than humans. The complaint also claims that the defendants exclusively licensed GPT-4 to Microsoft, the largest technology company in the world, for their own financial gain and without Musk’s consent or knowledge.
The complaint seeks to compel the defendants to follow the original agreement and to return to their mission of developing AI for the public good. The complaint also seeks to recover any money or benefits that the defendants received from their unfair and improper practices, and to prevent them from using or developing any AI that is outside the scope of the agreement.
Question 2 of 5 for MS Copilot: List all grievances
MS Copilot’s answer:
According to the web page context, the legal grievances mentioned in the complaint filed by Elon Musk against Samuel Altman, Gregory Brockman, OpenAI, Inc. and other defendants are:
Breach of Contract: The plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated the founding agreement of OpenAI, Inc. by turning it into a for-profit entity, licensing its technology to Microsoft, and keeping its research secret from the public.
Promissory Estoppel: The plaintiff alleges that the defendants made false promises to induce him to contribute millions of dollars and other resources to OpenAI, Inc., and then reneged on those promises to his detriment.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty: The plaintiff alleges that the defendants owed him a fiduciary duty to use his contributions for the intended non-profit and humanitarian purposes, but instead used them for their own personal and commercial gain.
Unfair Business Practices: The plaintiff alleges that the defendants engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by soliciting donations from him and others under false pretenses, and by misappropriating the funds and intellectual property of OpenAI, Inc.
Accounting: The plaintiff seeks an accounting of the funds donated by him and others to OpenAI, Inc., and of the use and distribution of the assets and technology of OpenAI, Inc.
Question 3 of 5 for MS Copilot: List the key evidence that is being presented.
MS Copilot’s answer:
Here is a summary of the key evidence presented in the web page:
The Founding Agreement: The web page is a complaint filed by Elon Musk against OpenAI and its co-founders, Samuel Altman and Gregory Brockman, for breaching the founding agreement of OpenAI, a non-profit AI research lab. The founding agreement stipulated that OpenAI would develop artificial general intelligence (AGI) for the benefit of humanity, not for profit, and would be open-source, balancing only safety considerations. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated this agreement by secretly developing AGI for Microsoft, a for-profit company, and keeping their technology closed and proprietary.
Mr. Musk’s Contributions: The web page details how Mr. Musk was a moving force behind the creation of OpenAI, contributing a majority of its funding, advising on research directions, and recruiting some of the world’s leading scientists and engineers. The complaint claims that Mr. Musk made these contributions in reliance on the founding agreement, and that his contributions were essential for OpenAI’s success and reputation.
The 2023 Breach: The web page describes how in 2023, the defendants breached the founding agreement by releasing GPT-4, a powerful language model that is allegedly an AGI algorithm, without disclosing its internal design or publishing any scientific papers. The complaint asserts that GPT-4 is a de facto Microsoft proprietary algorithm, integrated into its Office software suite, and that Microsoft obtained rights to AGI outside the scope of its license with OpenAI. The complaint also alleges that the defendants orchestrated a board coup to remove Mr. Altman and Mr. Brockman from OpenAI, and that they joined a new Microsoft AI research lab with access to OpenAI’s technology and talent.
The Harm to Humanity: The web page argues that the defendants’ actions have caused irreparable harm to humanity, by depriving the public of the benefits of AGI, by creating a monopoly for Microsoft over AGI, and by exposing humanity to the existential risks of AGI in the hands of a closed, for-profit company. The complaint seeks to compel OpenAI to adhere to the founding agreement and return to its mission to develop AGI for the benefit of humanity, not to personally benefit the defendants and Microsoft.
Question 4 of 5 for MS Copilot: Should Elon Musk win, what can be the consequences for OpenAI?
MS Copilot’s answer:
The consequences for OpenAI if Elon Musk wins the lawsuit are not clear, but they could be significant. Based on the web search results, some possible outcomes are:
OpenAI may have to stop developing or licensing GPT-4 and other AGI models, and return them to the public domain, as per the founding agreement.
OpenAI may have to pay damages or restitution to Musk and other donors who contributed to the non-profit with the expectation of ethical and open AI research.
OpenAI may have to restructure its board and governance, and restore its original mission and vision, with more oversight and accountability from Musk and other co-founders.
OpenAI may face legal challenges or investigations from other parties, such as the European Union Commission, which is looking into Microsoft’s investment in OpenAI.
OpenAI may lose credibility and trust in the AI community and the public, and face criticism and backlash for its alleged betrayal of its non-profit and humanitarian goals.
Question 5 of 5 for MS Copilot: How should or could OpenAI have prevented this situation?
MS Copilot’s answer:
There is no definitive answer to how OpenAI could have prevented this situation, but based on the web search results, some possible suggestions are:
OpenAI could have stayed as a non-profit organization, and sought alternative sources of funding, such as grants, donations, or partnerships, that would not compromise its mission and values.
OpenAI could have clarified and enforced the terms and conditions of its license agreement with Microsoft, and ensured that it had the right to review and approve any use of its technology by Microsoft or any other entity.
OpenAI could have maintained a diverse and independent board of directors, with representatives from different stakeholders, such as donors, researchers, ethicists, and regulators, who would oversee and guide the company’s decisions and actions.
OpenAI could have engaged more with the AI community and the public, and solicited feedback and input from various experts and groups on its research and development, and its ethical and social implications.
OpenAI could have prioritized and invested more in AI safety and transparency, and developed mechanisms and standards to ensure that its AI systems are aligned with human values, and that their design and performance are understandable and explainable.
